## The Nobel Prize In Mathematics to an Unique Coronait Formula to extract prime numbers from prime numbers discovered by Dr. Sadanand Paul

Entry type: Single project

Country/area: India

Publishing organisation: 1. messengerofart.in
2. pravakta.com
3. jayvijay.co.in
4. makingindiaonline.in
etc.

Organisation size: Small

Publication date: 2022-12-22

Language: Hindi, English Biography:

● Researcher : Dr. Sadanand Paul
● Achievements of Researcher :
Post Graduate in four subjects, NET passed, JRF (MoC), Honorary Doctorate. Named for most 300+ records including ‘Guinness World Records Holder’, Limca Book of Records Holder, India Book of Records, RHR-UK, Telugu Book of Records, Bihar Book of Records Holder for ‘World Records’.’National Award’ recipient by Indian President. Published 10,000 versatile articles and letters including Mathematics Diary, Poorvanchal’s Folktale Gopichand, Love in Darwin. Youngest newspaper editor. Qualify in 500+ government level exams. Most nominated for the Padma Award. Participation in many public awareness campaigns.

#### Project description:

Having escaped from the terror of ‘corona’ in lockdown, I have lived in seclusion, then only the terrorized numbers of the mathematical world or now it can also be called ‘Prime Numbers. I (Sadanand Paul) have discovered the New Formula ‘Coronait Formula’ to extract prime numbers from prime numbers. It is important to note that the entire mathematical world is also familiar with prime numbers, so it is also familiar because of the confusion. It is certainly true that prime numbers.

#### Impact reached:

The formula that I have developed, it is about knowing and removing prime numbers from prime numbers itself, it can be called a lockdown achievement. An Interested in writing and mathematics. If writing can be called ‘writer’, then why can’t I be called ‘Mathematician’ because of mathematical investigation ! Come, I have searched some theorems to know the prime number or the upcoming prime number, it is formulated :-

Rule of Method – 1

Multiply all the Consecutive Prime Numbers from the first to the nearest, so far as the prime numbers want to know, but the digits do not include 5 in this multiplication. Remember, the first prime number is 2 digits. As-

2 × 3
2 × 3 × 7
2 × 3 × 7 × 11
2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13
2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17
2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19

Rule of Method – 2

If we add 1 to the product obtained by taking Rule of Method-1, then it is obtained as a prime number. As-

2 × 3 = 6 +1 = 7 (prime number)

In the same way as from Condica-1:

42 + 1 = 43 (prime number),
462 + 1 = 463 (prime number),
6006 + 1 = 6007 (prime number),
102102 + 1 = 102103 (prime number),
1939938 + 1 = 1939939 (prime number)

(with to be continued…)

#### Techniques/technologies used:

Rule of Method – 3

Adding 1 to the product by taking Rule of Method-2, if the unit digit of the resulting number is 0, 5 or even, then it will not be a series prime number. Therefore, leaving this type of series will come in the next series, but will not deprive multiplication of any consecutive prime numbers in multiplication of successive prime numbers. As-

2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19 × 23 = 44618574 + 1
= 44618575 has unit digit 5, so it is a composite number.

Now since the number obtained from the product and sum is due to the prime number ’23’, we will decide to use the prime number called ’23’ for the next step (series), even if the number is ‘divisible’, not discard it. As-

2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19 × 23 × 29 = 1293938646 + 1
= 1293938647 The prime number is obtained.

Rule of Method – 4

All the product of such series will be a composite number, but by finding the condition quoted in the above mentioned terms, find the ‘prime number’ by +1 in the product! As-

2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19 × 23 × 29 × 31
= 40112098026 + 1 = 40112098027 Prime No. (PN).

2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19 × 23 × 29 × 31 × 37
= 1484147626962 + 1 = 1484147626963 (PN)

(with to be continued…)

Rule of Method – 5

To find out whether a number is a prime number or not, first find the square root of that number. If the square root number obtained is numbered after the decimal, it is not used, but the number that comes before the decimal, by +1 the number that is received, including all the numbers below them. Let’s try to divide. Let it be known that even numbers and numbers with 0 and 5 ‘unit’ digits are natural that they will be divisible. Except this, we will try to deduct from all other numbers or numbers, if not divided, then those numbers will be prime, as-

Square root of 37 = 6.0827625303 Put 6 in it, then do 6 + 1, which is 7. Now they have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, including 7, trying to divide 37 by these digits, which are not cut off from anyone. It is known that 37 is not even even. So rules do not cut 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 to 37, this is also easy to do.

Square root of 123 = 11.0905365064, put 11, then 11 + 1, which is 12. Now they have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, including 12, trying to divide 123 by these digits, which are cut by 3. It is known that 123 is not an even number. So rules do not cut 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 to 123, this is also easy to do.

Rule of Method – 6

In exceptional circumstances, be bound with the condyle, the rules and conditions for New PN will be incorporated as soon as possible ! The above approach can also be called Coronait Formula.

#### What can other journalists learn from this project?

Fermat’s Last theorem (FLT) is easily collapsed with ‘Figure number’ discovered by Dr. Sadanand Paul

The FLT theorem was first written in 1637 by French lawyer and mathematician Pierre de Fermat to estimate the margins of a page of a book of arithmetic in the margins, and he also claimed that he had proof, but to solve it in the margin there is not enough space for!

This amazing theorem ie Fermat’s or Ferma’s final theorem (FLT) of the world of mathematics has been uncertain since his death in the year 1665, when the aforesaid book was removed by his son for some reason. Today’s mathematicians do not think of carrying the equivalent of mathematical knowledge of the 17th century, for which reason mathematicians have not yet been able to find proof of Pier de Fermat’s theorem. It was published in 1676 by the Royal Society, London. Format’s solution was hidden around the 16th century, which I have discovered, by the way, many math experts, teachers and mathematicians have claimed to have solved it and cut it out! I (Sadanand Paul) have named it “Non FLT”, that is, the processes by which FLT is cut.”

(with to be continued…)

https://www.pravakta.com/unique-coronaite-formulas-to-extract-prime-numbers-from-prime-numbers/?amp=1